EPL is a weak copyleft license, however it is a non-viral copyleft so it only applies to the source of what was EPL'ed, not to what you build on top of the EPL project. In the MPL the “licensing unit” is the source file. FAQ on 2021 License Change | Elastic Neptune: dark blue theme with some red reflections from the distant sun. Die Eclipse Public License ist als … Eclipse Public License 1.0 | projects.eclipse.org Eclipse Public License – Published by the Eclipse Foundation, the EPL 1.0 license is similar to the GPL but allows users to link to proprietary code without publishing the source code. Eclipse Eclipse publishes the JARs on Maven Central making it easy to consume them also in non Eclipse based applications. The package name should be tutorial. Eclipse Eclipse Public License 1.0 (EPL-1.0) Explained in Plain English Mozilla is the custodian of the Mozilla Public License ("MPL"), an open source/free software license.. Sustituye a la Licencia Pública Común (CPL) y elimina ciertas condiciones relativas a los litigios sobre patentes. These two licenses have a fair amount in common, including that both allow for aggregate works to be sublicensed. Open Source Licenses: Types and Comparison | Snyk The Eclipse Public License is designed to be a business friendly free software license, and features weaker copyleft … This means that when using the source code, you can choose which set of terms and conditions will best meet your needs. Eclipse更新了Eclipse公共许可（EPL）_Java_Abraham Marín …